Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033388›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Barriers and willingness to express consent to organ donation among the Kazakhstani population.

Aidos Bolatov, Aruzhan Asanova, Gulnur Daniyarova, Vitaliy Sazonov, Yuliya Semenova, Aigerim Abdiorazova, Yuriy Pya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aidos Bolatov *"University Medical Center" Corporate Fund, Zhanibek khandar str. 5/1, Astana, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan. bolatovaidos@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5390-4623
Aruzhan Asanova *"University Medical Center" Corporate Fund, Zhanibek khandar str. 5/1, Astana, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan. asanova.aruzhan@umc.org.kz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3886-9268
Gulnur Daniyarova"University Medical Center" Corporate Fund, Zhanibek khandar str. 5/1, Astana, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5876-7528
Vitaliy Sazonov"University Medical Center" Corporate Fund, Zhanibek khandar str. 5/1, Astana, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0437-4694
Yuliya SemenovaSchool of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1324-7806
Aigerim Abdiorazova"University Medical Center" Corporate Fund, Zhanibek khandar str. 5/1, Astana, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9366-9800
Yuriy Pya"University Medical Center" Corporate Fund, Zhanibek khandar str. 5/1, Astana, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7249-0510

Funding

Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan BR21882206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrgan donation is a critical component of healthcare, yet donation rates in Kazakhstan remain low. Understanding the socio-demographic factors, knowledge levels, and perceived barriers influencing individuals' willingness to consent to organ donation is essential for developing effective interventions.

methodsThis cross-sectional study surveyed 1,294 participants across Kazakhstan. The sample was predominantly female (78.3%), urban (79.4%), and well-educated, with a significant proportion having medical backgrounds. Data were collected on socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge about organ donation, and perceived barriers. Comparison methods and binomial logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of willingness to express consent for organ donation.

resultsAge, ethnicity, family status, and knowledge about organ donation were significant predictors of willingness to donate. Older participants and Russian ethnic group members were less likely to consent, while widowed individuals and those with higher knowledge levels were more likely to express consent. Although several factors did not have significant prediction with willingness to donate in the regression analysis, chi-square and U-tests revealed significant associations for residence, occupation, educational level, and religious affiliation. Key barriers to donation included distrust in the medical system, fears of organ trafficking, and insufficient awareness, particularly among non-medical participants. These barriers were significant deterrents and correlated with lower willingness to donate. However, due to the overrepresentation of urban, educated, and medical-affiliated participants in the sample, findings may not fully reflect the general population of Kazakhstan.

conclusionThe findings highlight the need for targeted educational campaigns to increase public awareness and address misconceptions about organ donation. Building trust in the medical system and dispelling fears of unethical practices are essential for improving donation rates. The study underscores the complex interplay of socio-demographic factors, knowledge, and perceived barriers in shaping organ donation decisions in Kazakhstan, while also emphasizing the need for future research with a more representative sample.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInformed ConsentTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKazakhstanMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBarriersKazakhstanKnowledgeOrgan donationWillingness

Identifiers

PMID40033388
PMCPMC11874700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.