Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033340›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

Somatosensory training: a systematic review and meta-analysis with methodological considerations and clinical insights.

Ryoki Sasaki, Sho Kojima, Kei Saito, Hideaki Onishi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryoki SasakiKanagawa University of Human Services, Heisei-Cho 1-10-1, Yokosuka City, Kanagawa, 238-8522, Japan. sasaki-5mb@kuhs.ac.jp.
Sho KojimaInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata City, Niigata, Japan.
Kei SaitoInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata City, Niigata, Japan.
Hideaki OnishiInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata City, Niigata, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19H01090Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 222270200002MY
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatosensory training, which involves repetitive somatosensory stimulation, has been employed to enhance somatosensory performance by modulating excitability in the primary somatosensory cortex. This process, known as perceptual learning, can benefit stroke patients with somatosensory deficits. However, its effectiveness in both healthy individuals and stroke patients has not been thoroughly investigated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of somatosensory training in these groups. However, no eligible data on stroke patients were identified, excluding them from the analysis. In healthy participants, somatosensory training improved performance in 61.2% datasets, but this effect was observed only at the stimulated site. Additionally, it increased early somatosensory-evoked potential amplitudes in 76.9% of datasets at the stimulated site, with no effect on the non-stimulated site. Despite these moderate improvements, the risk of bias assessment revealed methodological concerns including randomization process, proper control conditions, blinding information, and missing data. The meta-analysis focused on the impact of somatosensory training on tactile two-point discrimination (TPD) in various factors, including different age groups, stimulus durations, stimulus frequencies, and stimulus types. A marked reduction in TPD threshold was observed at the stimulated finger post-training compared to pre-training, though there was a noticeable heterogeneity across studies. In contrast, no significant changes occurred at the non-stimulated fingers, and the subgroup analysis found no specific factors influencing TPD improvements. Although somatosensory training benefits healthy individuals, the variability and methodological concerns highlight the need for further high-quality research to optimize its use in treating somatosensory deficits in stroke patients.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, SomatosensorySomatosensory CortexStroke RehabilitationTouch PerceptionHumansStrokeMeta-analysisPrimary somatosensory cortexRepetitive somatosensory stimulationSomatosensory trainingStroke patientsTwo-point discrimination

Identifiers

PMID40033340
PMCPMC11874847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.