Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033316›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Exploring resilience in critical care nursing: a qualitative inquiry into continuous adaptation, collaborative unity, and emotional balance.

Eman Arafa Hassan, Shimmaa Mohamed Elsayed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eman Arafa HassanCritical Care and Emergency Nursing, Critical Care and Emergency Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. eman_arafa@alexu.edu.eg.
Shimmaa Mohamed ElsayedCritical Care and Emergency Nursing, Critical Care and Emergency Nursing Department Faculty of Nursing, Damanhour University, El Beheira, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResilience is essential for nurses in critical care, where they face high-stakes situations requiring continuous adaptation, collaborative unity, and emotional balance. This study aimed to investigate resilience in critical care nursing, focusing on how nurses adapt to challenges, the role of teamwork in fostering resilience, and strategies for maintaining emotional balance.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to explore resilience among critical care nurses, emphasizing their adaptation to challenges, the influence of collaborative practices, and methods for sustaining emotional well-being in intensive care units.

methodsA qualitative study with a thematic analysis approach was used in this study. The study was conducted in five intensive care units across two hospitals in Egypt. The purposeful sampling approach includes 17 critical care nurses with diverse experiences. Data was collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews using an interview guide focusing on challenges, adaptation strategies, collaborative practices, and coping mechanisms.

resultsThemes emerge, depicting resilience as a dynamic process encompassing continuous adaptation, learning, collaborative unity, emotional balance, self-care, and reflection on experiences. Nurses emphasize the importance of teamwork, interprofessional collaboration, and managing emotional complexities. Resilience is portrayed as a collective force within the critical care team, balancing compassion and clinical precision.

conclusionCritical care nurses demonstrate resilience as a multifaceted and dynamic process. The study provides insights into the collaborative strategies employed and the emotional aspects of resilience. Acknowledging vulnerabilities and prioritizing self-care are integral to sustaining resilience.

Indexed as

Critical careEmotional well-beingNursesResilienceTeamwork

Identifiers

PMID40033316
PMCPMC11877925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.