Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033295›Full record

ReviewJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2025

The traditional knowledge about the biodiversity of edible Brazilian fruits and their pollinators: an integrative review.

Luan Victor Brandão Dos Santos, Daniel Pereira Monteiro, André Luiz Borba do Nascimento, Roseli Farias Melo de Barros

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luan Victor Brandão Dos SantosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Campus Ministro Petrônio Portela, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil. luanbrandao2@outlook.com.
Daniel Pereira MonteiroPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
André Luiz Borba do NascimentoCoordenação de Ciências Naturais/Biologia, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Campus Centro de Ciências de Bacabal, Bacabal, Brazil.
Roseli Farias Melo de BarrosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Campus Ministro Petrônio Portela, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brazilian fruit trees are vital for food security, and their pollination is crucial. This study aimed to build a database of edible fruit trees and their pollinators in Brazil, integrating ethnobotanical and pollination ecology research. The database was built from an integrative review of ethnobotanical records of edible fruit plants and pollination biology research in Brazil. The data were then statistically treated with the Wilcoxon test to understand the influence of the origin factors (native and exotic) on species richness associated between the groups. In total, 175 ethnobotanical scientific articles were collected, and these cited the food consumption of 557 species of fruit trees. A total of 557 fruit tree species were identified, with only 29.4% having recorded pollinators. Exotic pollinators tend to prefer exotic plants, while native pollinators show greater versatility. Hymenoptera, especially bees, are the most important pollinators. A significant knowledge gap remains regarding the diversity of pollinators and their interactions with fruit trees. Increased research is needed to address this and ensure the conservation of these important food plants. The data presented in this study can provide a solid foundation for future research focused on pollination ecology and the conservation of important food plants in Brazil.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEthnobotanyFruitPlants, EdiblePollinationAnimalsBeesBrazilHumansKnowledgeApidaeFood sovereigntySpecies richnessTraditional knowledge

Identifiers

PMID40033295
PMCPMC11877955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.