ArticleBMC cancer2025
A novel prognostic model utilizing TMTV and SUVmax from
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of lesion dissemination onQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurvival prediction accuracy of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (
methodsWe analyzed 390 ENKTL patients with comprehensive clinical and survival data. All patients received asparaginase-based chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy, or radiotherapy alone. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) was calculated using a 41% SUVmax threshold, and TLG was computed as MTV multiplied by the average SUV. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with log-rank tests. Optimal cut-off values were determined using the Youden' index. Cox regression analysis identified significant prognostic factors. A nomogram predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was developed and validated using the C-index and calibration curves. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
resultsOf the 390 patients, 262 (67.2%) were included in the training set and 128 (32.8%) in the validation set.
conclusionSUVmax, TMTV, and TLG are independent prognostic factors in ENKTL. Our new model, which integrates
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.