ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Culturally sensitive mental health research: a scoping review.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mental health of Ukrainian refugees in Germany compared to other population groups - Results from the IAB-BAMF-SOEP Survey 2023.Journal of health monitoring · 2026Article
- Review
- Amyloid PET and clinical management in a diverse, cognitively impaired population: The New IDEAS Study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Observational
- What do patients consider sensitive health information? A cross-sectional survey of national patient portal users.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGiven disparities in healthcare outcomes between ethnocultural groups, there is a need for research to be sensitive to cultural needs and differences to consequently address health inequalities. As part of a project aiming to co-produce a publicly acceptable core mental health dataset (CMHDS) for use in physical health research, evidence was sought as to how this could be made inclusive of a diverse population. The objective was to answer the following questions: What is best practice for culturally sensitive mental health research? How should mental health research be adapted to be culturally sensitive? METHODOLOGY: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the following four electronic databases: PsychINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL and Medline as well as a capped Google search (using both the generic search engine and Google Scholar). Articles were screened at the title and abstract level and at full text by two reviewers. Key topics and conclusions from the included papers were tabulated and grouped in order to identify themes.
results575 results were identified from the database searches after removing duplicates, which were narrowed down to 95 potential studies after the first round of screening by title and abstract. Full text article review in the second round of screening resulted in a total of 41 included articles for the final analysis. The 100 Google results were all assessed for eligibility with 2 being included. In total, 43 results were identified of relevance and included in the review. Overarching themes identified were as follows: the definition of ethnocultural groups, the impact of language, the influence of research team composition, appropriate research methodologies, and ethical responsibilities of researchers.
conclusionsThe authors conclude that culturally sensitive research requires ongoing commitment to critical analysis, self-reflection, and collaboration from both researchers and institutions. Ethical considerations, including the historical context of racism and colonisation in mental health research, must be acknowledged to build trust and ensure that research outputs are equitable and applicable to diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.