Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033243›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2025

The burden of neonatal sepsis and its risk factors in Africa. a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Endalk Birrie Wondifraw, Muluken Amare Wudu, Birhanu Desu Tefera, Kindu Yinges Wondie

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Endalk Birrie WondifrawDepartment of Pediatric and Child Health Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia. endalkbirrie85@gmail.com.
Muluken Amare WuduDepartment of Pediatric and Child Health Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.
Birhanu Desu TeferaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.
Kindu Yinges WondieDepartment of Clinical Midwifery College of Medicine and Health Science, University, Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal sepsis is a significant cause of newborn mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Together, infections, complications of preterm birth, and intrapartum-related conditions contribute to nearly 90% of all neonatal deaths. Africa experiences high rates of neonatal deaths due to sepsis, with insufficient prevention efforts. Understanding the burden of neonatal sepsis is essential to reducing these deaths in the region. This study aims to estimate the pooled magnitude of neonatal sepsis and identify its associated risk factors in Africa.

methodFor this study, we gathered data by searching various databases until August 20, 2024, including PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, Hinari, Google, Cochrane Library, African Journals Online, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Full-text articles in English, both published and unpublished, from 2000 to 2024 were included. However, sources like citations without abstracts or full texts, unidentified reports, editorials, summaries of research, meta-analyses, and qualitative studies were not included in the study. We evaluated the quality of the selected papers using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for observational studies. Data extraction was completed in Microsoft Excel, and analysis was conducted using STATA V.17 Statistical Software. We assessed study heterogeneity with the I

resultThis review includes 49 studies with 87,548 neonates. The overall magnitude of neonatal sepsis in Africa was found to be 40.98% (95% confidence interval (CI): 30.50% to 51.46%) P: 0.00. The study found that factors such as prolonged rupture of membranes (Odds ratio (OR) 4.11, 95% CI: 2.81-5.41) P: 0.00, a history of the urinary tract or sexually transmitted infections (OR 3.28, 95% CI: 1.97-4.58) P: 0.00, low birth weight (< 2500 g) (OR 6.95, 95% CI: 3-10.89) P: 0.00, an Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration (APGAR) score below 7 at the first minute (OR 7.56, 95% CI: 3.39-11.73) P: 0.00, preterm birth (OR 5.38, 95% CI: 3.23-7.5) P: 0.00, and neonates who were resuscitated at birth (OR 3.26, 95% CI: 1.96-4.56) P: 0.00.

conclusionThe magnitude of neonatal sepsis in Africa remains high. This study identified several contributing factors, including prolonged rupture of membranes, a history of urinary tract or sexually transmitted infections, low birth weight (< 2500 g), an APGAR score below 7 at one minute, preterm birth, and resuscitation at birth. These findings underscore the importance of routinely screening for risk factors such as prolonged membrane rupture and maternal infections. Enhancing antenatal care, training providers in early neonatal sepsis management, and enforcing infection control measures.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessNeonatal SepsisAfricaDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornRisk FactorsAfricaBurdenMeta-analysisNeonatesRiskSepsis

Identifiers

PMID40033243
PMCPMC11877888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.