ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for prediction of pediatric recurrent intussusception in ultrasound images and radiographs.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of early recurrence in primary intussusception: development of an ultrasound-based radiomics and deep learning nomogram.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- A vision transformer deep learning model for assessing pediatric ileocolic intussusception severity using ultrasound images.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Fluoroscopic image-driven deep learning model for predicting intussusception irreducibility during air enema in children.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in pediatric general surgery: a systematic review.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposesTo develop a predictive model for recurrent intussusception based on abdominal ultrasound (US) images and abdominal radiographs.
methodsA total of 3665 cases of intussusception were retrospectively collected from January 2017 to December 2022. The cohort was randomly assigned to training and validation sets at a 6:4 ratio. Two types of images were processed: abdominal grayscale US images and abdominal radiographs. These images served as inputs for the deep learning algorithm and were individually processed by five detection models for training, with each model predicting its respective categories and probabilities. The optimal models were selected individually for decision fusion to obtain the final predicted categories and their probabilities.
resultsWith US, the VGG11 model showed the best performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.669 (95% CI: 0.635-0.702). In contrast, with radiographs, the ResNet18 model excelled with an AUC of 0.809 (95% CI: 0.776-0.841). We then employed two fusion methods. In the averaging fusion method, the two models were combined to reach a diagnostic decision. Specifically, a soft voting scheme was used to average the probabilities predicted by each model, resulting in an AUC of 0.877 (95% CI: 0.846-0.908). In the stacking fusion method, a meta-model was built based on the predictions of the two optimal models. This approach notably enhanced the overall predictive performance, with LightGBM emerging as the top performer, achieving an AUC of 0.897 (95% CI: 0.869-0.925). Both fusion methods demonstrated excellent performance.
conclusionsDeep learning algorithms developed using multimodal medical imaging may help predict recurrent intussusception. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.