Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033220›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2025

Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for prediction of pediatric recurrent intussusception in ultrasound images and radiographs.

Yu-Feng Qian, Wan-Liang Guo

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yu-Feng QianDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Wan-Liang GuoDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. gwlsuzhou@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposesTo develop a predictive model for recurrent intussusception based on abdominal ultrasound (US) images and abdominal radiographs.

methodsA total of 3665 cases of intussusception were retrospectively collected from January 2017 to December 2022. The cohort was randomly assigned to training and validation sets at a 6:4 ratio. Two types of images were processed: abdominal grayscale US images and abdominal radiographs. These images served as inputs for the deep learning algorithm and were individually processed by five detection models for training, with each model predicting its respective categories and probabilities. The optimal models were selected individually for decision fusion to obtain the final predicted categories and their probabilities.

resultsWith US, the VGG11 model showed the best performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.669 (95% CI: 0.635-0.702). In contrast, with radiographs, the ResNet18 model excelled with an AUC of 0.809 (95% CI: 0.776-0.841). We then employed two fusion methods. In the averaging fusion method, the two models were combined to reach a diagnostic decision. Specifically, a soft voting scheme was used to average the probabilities predicted by each model, resulting in an AUC of 0.877 (95% CI: 0.846-0.908). In the stacking fusion method, a meta-model was built based on the predictions of the two optimal models. This approach notably enhanced the overall predictive performance, with LightGBM emerging as the top performer, achieving an AUC of 0.897 (95% CI: 0.869-0.925). Both fusion methods demonstrated excellent performance.

conclusionsDeep learning algorithms developed using multimodal medical imaging may help predict recurrent intussusception. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Deep LearningIntussusceptionRadiography, AbdominalAlgorithmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesROC CurveUltrasonographyDeep learningIntussusceptionPrediction modelRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID40033220
PMCPMC11874663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.