Model-based cost-impact analysis of a diagnostic test for patients with community-acquired pneumonia in Canada.

backgroundAntibiotics are broadly prescribed for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) despite being only effective for bacterial infections. LIAISON

methodsWe developed a cost-impact model to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of using LMMBV with the current standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone among a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 CAP patients presenting to the emergency department. The analysis was conducted from a Canadian public health payer's perspective. Outcomes of interest included antibiotic use (number of patients and days saved), hospital admission (admissions avoided and days saved), intensive care unit admission, adverse events, and clostridium difficile infection. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore parameter uncertainty. Scenario analyses were conducted according to age group, province, and impact of LMMBV on hospitalization.

resultsIn the base case, LMMBV plus SOC reduced the number of patients prescribed antibiotic treatment (429 patients avoided) and the total number of antibiotic treatment days (1,020 days avoided). The per-patient cost savings were $504.96 compared to SOC alone. These findings were consistent across all sensitivity and scenario analyses. Assuming full adoption of LMMBV, the per patient cost savings are projected to result in more than $163 million in total savings annually in Canada based on population estimates and published incidence data.

conclusionConsidering the burden of CAP and antimicrobial resistance to the health care system, the use of LMMBV with SOC can offer both clinical and economic benefits to Canadian public payers.