Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033198›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025

Explainable machine learning model for predicting acute pancreatitis mortality in the intensive care unit.

Meng Jiang, Xiao-Peng Wu, Xing-Chen Lin, Chang-Li Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Acute pancreatitis: mechanisms and therapeutic approaches.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meng Jiang *Emergency and Trauma Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, #79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China. jmhust@zju.edu.cn.
Xiao-Peng Wu *State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xing-Chen LinEmergency and Trauma Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, #79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China.
Chang-Li LiDepartment of FSTC Clinic, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, P.R. China. lcl_hubei@126.com.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2022ZFJH003National Natural Science Foundation of China 82000478Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LMS25H180003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent prediction models are suboptimal for determining mortality risk in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP); this might be improved by using a machine learning (ML) model. In this study, we aimed to construct an explainable ML model to calculate the risk of mortality in patients with AP admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) and compared it with existing scoring systems.

methodsA gradient-boosting ML (XGBoost) model was developed and externally validated based on two public databases: Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC, training cohort) and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD, validation cohort). We compared the performance of the XGBoost model with validated clinical risk scoring systems (the APACHE IV, SOFA, and Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis [BISAP]) by area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) method was applied to provide the explanation behind the prediction outcome.

resultsThe XGBoost model performed better than the clinical scoring systems in correctly predicting mortality risk of AP patients, achieving an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94). When set the sensitivity at 100% for death prediction, the model had a specificity of 38%, much higher than the APACHE IV, SOFA and BISAP score, which had a specificity of 1%, 16% and 1% respectively.

conclusionsThis model might increase identification of very low-risk patients who can be safely monitored in a general ward for management. By making the model explainable, physicians would be able to better understand the reasoning behind the prediction.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsMachine LearningPancreatitisAcute DiseaseAdultAgedAPACHEFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentROC CurveSeverity of Illness IndexAcute pancreatitisMortalityPredictionPrognostic factorXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID40033198
PMCPMC11877909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.