Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033187›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

Distribution and phylogenetic analysis of porcine parvoviruses in the wild boar population of Russia.

Alina Komina, Nikita Krasnikov, Maria Simakova, Valentina Rykova, Elena Zhukova, Alexander Bulgakov, Anton Yuzhakov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alina KominaFederal State Budget Scientific Institution "Federal Scientific Center VIEV", Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7173-5501
Nikita KrasnikovFederal State Budget Scientific Institution "Federal Scientific Center VIEV", Moscow, Russia. nick.krasnickoff2011@yandex.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8148-3080
Maria SimakovaFederal State Budget Scientific Institution "Federal Scientific Center VIEV", Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5506-9729
Valentina RykovaFederal State Budget Scientific Institution "Federal Scientific Center VIEV", Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0171-2259
Elena ZhukovaFederal State Budget Scientific Institution "Federal Scientific Center VIEV", Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7423-6102
Alexander BulgakovFederal State Budget Scientific Institution "Federal Scientific Center VIEV", Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8405-8562
Anton YuzhakovFederal State Budget Scientific Institution "Federal Scientific Center VIEV", Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0426-9678

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 23-76-10055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPorcine parvoviruses (PPVs) are widespread worldwide in the swine population. PPV1 is a significant infectious agent in pig production, causing porcine reproductive failure. The pathogenic potential of novel PPVs has been poorly studied. Since wild boars are a reservoir for PPVs, the aim of this study was to investigate their prevalence and genetic diversity in the wild boar population. Tissue samples (spleen, lungs, and lymph nodes) collected from 108 wild boars from three regions of Russia during 2021-2024 were analyzed.

resultsPPV1-7 were found in wild boar populations in Russia, and the most abundant species were PPV7 (59.3%) and PPV3 (49.1%). The research did not reveal any significant relationship between the gender and age of the animals and the prevalence of PPVs. A comparison between the detection rates of PPVs and PCV2/PCV3 revealed the random nature of coinfections. For phylogenetic analysis, complete VP1/VP2 gene sequences of 17 PPV1 isolates were obtained. Most of them belonged to the 27a-like group. Two isolates were in the same cluster as the highly virulent Kresse strain. Isolate BelWB57 had amino acid substitutions that were specific to both the Kresse and 27a-like strains, but it was not classified in either group. Additionally, three sequences for PPV2, PPV3, and PPV7, and one sequence for PPV5 and PPV6 VP1/VP2 genes were obtained. PPV2, PPV3, and PPV7 isolates demonstrated distribution across various clusters with strains from domestic pigs and wild boars from different countries. PPV6 isolate was included in the same clade as the Russian isolate from a domestic pig, whereas PPV5 did not enter any clade with representatives from our country.

conclusionsThis is the first work devoted to the study of the PPV1-7 prevalence, as well as the genetic characteristics of isolates circulating among wild boars in various regions of Russia. Our data showed that PPV1-7 is widespread in wild boar populations. Phylogenetic analysis of PPV1 demonstrates a significant prevalence of 27a-like isolates.

Indexed as

Parvoviridae InfectionsParvovirus, PorcinePhylogenySus scrofaSwine DiseasesAnimalsGenetic VariationMaleRussiaSwinePhylogenetic analysisPorcine parvovirusPorcine virusesPPV1–7Wild boar

Identifiers

PMID40033187
PMCPMC11874106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.