Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033175›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025

Critical revisits after discharge from the emergency department.

Zhenghong Liu, Raziyeh Mohammadi, Seyed Ehsan Saffari, Wei Lin Tallie Chua, Mingwei Ng, Fahad Javaid Siddiqui, Marcus Eng Hock Ong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhenghong Liu *Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore. liuzhenghong@hotmail.com.
Raziyeh Mohammadi *Center for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Seyed Ehsan SaffariCenter for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Wei Lin Tallie ChuaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
Mingwei NgDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
Fahad Javaid SiddiquiPrehospital and Emergency Research Centre, Health Services and Systems Research, Duke- NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Marcus Eng Hock OngDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.

Funding

SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medicine Grant AM/HSR018/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsEmergency department (ED) revisits within 72 h is a standard quality measure for emergency care but most revisits are managed and discharged. However, a sub-group of revisits are due to clinical deterioration resulting in admissions to higher acuity care or even mortality. We aimed to identify these critical revisits and their associated risk factors. Identification of these factors would allow development of strategies to reduce incidence of post discharge deterioration.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on all patients who had a revisit within 72 h of discharge from the ED of a tertiary hospital in Singapore from 2008 to 2020. Deidentified data were extracted from the electronic health records (EHR). We identified critical revisits, defined as a revisit that resulted in death or admission to Intensive Care Unit or High Dependency. These patients were compared to patients who had a revisit that resulted in discharge or admission to general ward. The main outcome was the rate of critical revisit. We also determined the commonest index and critical revisit ED diagnosis as well as factors associated with critical revisits.

resultsOut of 1,057,533 discharges from the ED over the study period, 44,506 (4.2%) had a revisit within 72 h, of which 1321 (0.12%) were critical revisits. Adjusted odds ratios from multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that higher heart rate, higher mean arterial pressure, and several lab abnormalities were associated with critical revisits. Diagnosis categories at the initial visit with the highest contribution to the likelihood of a critical revisit included "acute cerebrovascular disease" (OR: 38.00, 95%CI: 27.04-53.39), "other gastrointestinal disorders" (OR: 3.10, 95%CI: 2.41-3.99) and "residual codes; unclassified" (OR: 2.69, 95%CI: 2.01-3.60).

conclusionCritical revisits after discharge were rare in our study population, most prevalent amongst the elderly with multiple comorbidities. Future research should focus on diagnoses at higher risk of a critical revisit to develop practical approaches to follow up these patients.

Indexed as

Ed administrationPatient safetyRevisitsTriage

Identifiers

PMID40033175
PMCPMC11874766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.