ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2025
Comparison of Topical 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy With the Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure for Patients With Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Prospective and Propensity-Matched Analysis.
Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lasers in medical science · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (PDT) for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix associated with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection.
methodsIn this study, 120 patients who received treatment for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix from March 2023 to March 2024 were followed up prospectively, which were categorized into the PDT and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) groups and matched 1:1 using a propensity score. The regression rate of the lesions and the HPV clearance rate were compared between the groups at 6 and 12 months. Factors affecting the clearance rate were analyzed.
resultsAt the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, no significant difference was observed in the rate of lesion regression between the PDT (86.7%, 91.7%) and LEEP groups (85.0%, 93.3%) (p > 0.05), nor the HPV clearance rate (55.0%, 76.7% vs. 65.0%, 78.3%) (p > 0.05). Neither group had any lesions that progressed to Grade 3 or invasive cervical carcinoma at follow-up. According to regression analysis, thinprep cytology test (TCT) results influenced lesion regression in the PDT group.
conclusionCompared to the LEEP, 5-aminolevulinic acid PDT had a similar rate of lesion regression and HPV clearance for the treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix; thus, PDT offers an alternative and effective minimally invasive approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.