Trial reportNeurogastroenterology and motility2025
Therapeutic Value of Lactobacillus gasseri 345A in Chronic Constipation.
Trial report in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Probiotics in Alleviating Constipation: Mechanisms, Strain Screening, and Applications.Biology · 2026Review
- Current Understanding of Probiotic Strains and Immune Function: From Gut Microbiota to Systemic Immunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Clinical Guidance and Practical Recommendations for Probiotic Use in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Functional Constipation, andJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Review
- Clinical guidance and practical recommendations for probiotic use in patients with irritable bowel syndrome, functional constipation, and Clostridioides difficile infection considering sex-based differences: a Korean translation.Ewha medical journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic constipation is a prevalent, burdensome gastrointestinal disorder whose etiology and pathophysiology remain poorly understood. Differences in the composition of the intestinal microbiota have been shown between constipated patients and healthy people. Data indicate that these microbial differences contribute to the disorder.
methodsPreclinical studies in mice examined the effects of Lactobacillus gasseri on intestinal motility ex vivo, the reversal of motility inhibition by μ-opioid receptor agonists ex vivo and in vivo in mice, and the effects on capsaicin-stimulated transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) in Jurkat cells. Thereafter, a clinical study of 40 women with functional constipation was conducted to investigate the effects of Lactobacillus gasseri with a randomized parallel design. After 14 days of baseline recording, treatment with Lactobacillus gasseri or placebo was given over 28 days, with 14 days of follow-up. Outcomes with complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBM), spontaneous bowel movements, emptying frequency, abdominal pain, time spent for defecation, Bristol stool form scale, use of rescue laxatives, and impact on sex life were investigated. KEY
resultsIn preclinical studies, Lactobacillus gasseri increased intestinal motility in an ex vivo model, reversed the motility inhibition caused by μ-opioid receptor agonist ex vivo and in vivo in mice, and counteracted capsaicin-stimulated activity of TRPV1 in Jurkat cells. In the clinical trial, Lactobacillus gasseri showed a significant reduction in abdominal pain, along with a correlation and tendency for an increased number of CSBM. Few adverse events were encountered. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Treatment with Lactobacillus gasseri can alleviate pain sensations in functional constipation, possibly with an improved bowel-emptying function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.