Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033085›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Detection of obstetric anal sphincter injuries using machine learning-assisted impedance spectroscopy: a prospective, comparative, multicentre clinical study.

Katarzyna Borycka, Marcel Młyńczak, Maciej Rosoł, Kacper Korzeniewski, Piotr Iwanowski, Hynek Heřman, Petr Janku, Małgorzata Uchman-Musielak, Erik Dosedla, Enrique Gonzalez Diaz and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Katarzyna BoryckaOASIS Diagnostics, R&D of Medical Technology, Warsaw, Poland. katarzyna.borycka@oasis-diagnostics.eu.
Marcel MłyńczakOASIS Diagnostics, R&D of Medical Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej RosołOASIS Diagnostics, R&D of Medical Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Kacper KorzeniewskiOASIS Diagnostics, R&D of Medical Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr IwanowskiOASIS Diagnostics, R&D of Medical Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Hynek HeřmanInstitute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr JankuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Brno and Medical Faculty, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Małgorzata Uchman-MusielakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Solec Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
Erik DosedlaDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika, Košice, Slovakia.
Enrique Gonzalez DiazDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Leon, León, Spain.
Iwona Sudoł-SzopińskaDepartment of Radiology, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland.
Michał MikDepartment of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Carlo RattoProctology and Pelvic Floor Surgery Unit, Isola Tiberina Hospital, Gemelli Isola, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Antonino SpinelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju POIR.01.00.01-00-0726/18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical performance and safety of the ONIRY system for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) detection versus three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (EAUS). A prospective, comparative, multicentre, international study. Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, and Spain. 152 women between the first moments up to 8 weeks after vaginal delivery. Participants underwent EAUS and were allocated to groups based on OASIS classification: A (no perineal tear), B (1st or 2nd degree tear), or C (3rd or 4th degree, anal sphincters affected). Electric impedance was measured in the anal canal using the ONIRY system. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic outcome of impedance spectroscopy versus EAUS. Adverse events were collected. Part II involved in silico modelling and 10-time 10-fold cross-validation for automated analysis. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. 30 women were allocated to group A, 61 to group B, and 61 to group C. The diagnostic outcome was determined for 147 participants. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the ML-assisted impedance spectroscopy were 87.0 ± 0.5%, 90.6 ± 2.0%, and 84.6 ± 1.9%, respectively, compared with EAUS. After data cleaning, the performance metrics of the proposed final ML model for ONIRY were: 90.0 ± 0.4%, 90.0 ± 1.2%, and 90.0 ± 0.7%, respectively. No adverse device effects or deficiencies were observed. By enabling early identification of sphincter injuries, ML-assisted impedance spectroscopy facilitates timely diagnosis and intervention, potentially reducing long-term complications such as faecal incontinence. Its rapid, bedside application in obstetric settings supports immediate postpartum care, complementing digital rectal examination and optimizing clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Anal CanalDelivery, ObstetricDielectric SpectroscopyMachine LearningAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAnal sphincterClinical studyFaecal incontinenceImpedance spectroscopyMachine learningObstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI)Perineal tearRapid diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID40033085
PMCPMC11876446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.