Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033063›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2025

A Consensus Statement on establishing causality, therapeutic applications and the use of preclinical models in microbiome research.

Amira Metwaly, Aicha Kriaa, Zahra Hassani, Federica Carraturo, Celine Druart, IHMCSA Consortium, Kaline Arnauts, Paul Wilmes, Jens Walter, Stephan Rosshart and 6 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The Role of Akkermansia muciniphila in Obesity: Benefit or Harm?Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Gut microbiota in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Amira Metwaly *Chair of Nutrition and Immunology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5740-0230
Aicha Kriaa *Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Zahra HassaniKPL-Paris, Paris, France.
Federica CarraturoEuropean Biomedical Research Institute of Salerno (EBRIS), Salerno, Italy.
Celine DruartPharmabiotic Research Institute, Narbonne, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7786-9172
IHMCSA Consortium
Kaline ArnautsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Paul WilmesLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6478-2924
Jens WalterAPC Microbiome Ireland, School of Microbiology, and Department of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1754-172X
Stephan RosshartDepartment of Microbiome Research, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6989-8686
Mahesh S DesaiDepartment of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9223-2209
Joel DoreUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8756-0718
Alessio FasanoEuropean Biomedical Research Institute of Salerno (EBRIS), Salerno, Italy.
Hervé M BlottiereUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MetaGenoPolis, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8390-0607
Emmanuelle Maguin *Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France. emmanuelle.maguin@inrae.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5452-3382
Dirk Haller *Chair of Nutrition and Immunology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University Munich, Freising, Germany. dirk.haller@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6977-4085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome comprises trillions of microorganisms and profoundly influences human health by modulating metabolism, immune responses and neuronal functions. Disruption in gut microbiome composition is implicated in various inflammatory conditions, metabolic disorders and neurodegenerative diseases. However, determining the underlying mechanisms and establishing cause and effect is extremely difficult. Preclinical models offer crucial insights into the role of the gut microbiome in diseases and help identify potential therapeutic interventions. The Human Microbiome Action Consortium initiated a Delphi survey to assess the utility of preclinical models, including animal and cell-based models, in elucidating the causal role of the gut microbiome in these diseases. The Delphi survey aimed to address the complexity of selecting appropriate preclinical models to investigate disease causality and to study host-microbiome interactions effectively. We adopted a structured approach encompassing a literature review, expert workshops and the Delphi questionnaire to gather insights from a diverse range of stakeholders. Experts were requested to evaluate the strengths, limitations, and suitability of these models in addressing the causal relationship between the gut microbiome and disease pathogenesis. The resulting consensus statements and recommendations provide valuable insights for selecting preclinical models in future studies of gut microbiome-related diseases.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsDelphi TechniqueDisease Models, AnimalDysbiosisHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.