ArticleScientific reports2025
An NLP-based method to mine gene and function relationships from published articles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benchmarking commercial large language models for gene-disease-phenotype extraction from full-text human genetics literature.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Article
- AI-based methods for the assessment of DNA damage and repair mechanisms.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Review
- FuncFetch: an LLM-assisted workflow enables mining thousands of enzyme-substrate interactions from published manuscripts.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the intricacies of genes function within biological systems is paramount for scientific advancement and medical progress. Owing to the evolving landscape of this research and the complexity of biological processes, however, this task presents challenges. We introduce PATHAK, a natural language processing (NLP)-based method that mines relationships between genes and their functions from published scientific articles. PATHAK utilizes a pre-trained Transformer language model to generate sentence embeddings from a vast dataset of scientific documents. This enables the identification of meaningful associations between genes and their potential functional annotations. Our approach is adaptable and applicable across diverse scientific domains. Applying PATHAK to over 17,000 research articles focused on Arabidopsis thaliana, we assigned approximately 1493 GO terms to 10,976 genes by analyzing article sentences, comparing their embeddings to GO term embeddings, and mapping potential matches. The model demonstrates moderate-to-high predictive accuracy, capturing ~ 57% overlap of GO terms (6258 out of 10,976) between predicted and known annotations on TAIR, including 1271 and 161 exact matches and 4826 partially related terms. This method promises to significantly advance our understanding of gene functionality and potentially accelerate discoveries in the context of plant development, growth and stress responses in plants and other systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.