ArticleScientific reports2025
Improving accuracy for inferior alveolar nerve segmentation with multi-label of anatomical adjacent structures using active learning in cone-beam computed tomography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-based segmentation of mandibular canal on cone-beam computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oral radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Deep learning for automatic segmentation of the inferior alveolar nerve using a hybrid CNN-transformer framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advancements in deep learning have revolutionized digital dentistry, highlighting the importance of precise dental segmentation. This study leverages active learning with the three-dimensional (3D) nnU-net and multi-labels to improve segmentation accuracy of dental anatomies, including the maxillary sinuses, maxilla, mandible, and inferior alveolar nerves (IAN), which are important for implant planning, in 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Segmentation accuracy was compared using single-label, adjacent pair-label, and multi-label relevant anatomic structures with 60 CBCT scans from Kooalldam Dental Hospital and externally validated using data from Seoul National University Dental Hospital. The dataset was divided into three training stages for active learning. The evaluation metrics were assessed through the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean absolute difference. The overall internal test set DSCs from the multi-label, single-label, and pair-label models were 95%, 91% (paired t-test; p = 0.01), and 93% (p = 0.03), respectively. The DSC of the IAN in the internal and external datasets increased from 83% to 79%, 87% and 81%, to 90% and 86% for the single-label, pair-label, and multi-label models, respectively (all p = 0.01). Prediction accuracy improved over time, significantly reducing the manual correction time. Our active learning and multi-label strategies facilitated accurate automatic segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.