ArticleScientific reports2025
Multiparameter diagnostic model using S100A9, CCL5 and blood biomarkers for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Chemokines in Head and Neck Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based prediction of nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk: a clinical approach.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze S100A9 and CCL5 levels in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and evaluate their predictive value as blood-based indicators for NPC diagnosis. Serum S100A9 and CCL5 levels were measured in 123 patients newly diagnosed with NPC and 107 patients without NPC. Additionally, 38 patients (19 with NPC and 19 without) were recruited from Xiangya Hospital as an external validation cohort. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for NPC. Variable selection was conducted using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. NPC prediction models were developed using four machine-learning algorithms, and their performance was evaluated with ROC curves. Calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and Shapley additive explanation plots were employed for further evaluation and interpretation. Serum S100A9 and CCL5 levels were significantly elevated in patients with NPC compared with patients without NPC. Multivariate logistic regression identified S100A9, CCL5, TP, and ALB as independent predictors of NPC. ROC analysis demonstrated that S100A9 had superior diagnostic performance compared to CCL5 and other blood indicators, effectively differentiating NPC from non-NPC cases. A machine-learning-based logistic regression model incorporating S100A9, CCL5, ALB, GLB, and PLR demonstrated a reliable diagnostic value for NPC, achieving an Area under the curve (AUC) of 0.877 in the training cohort. The calibration curve showed excellent agreement between predicted and actual probabilities; in contrast, the DCA curve highlighted strong clinical utility. The model also performed well in the external validation cohort, with an AUC of 0.817. Serum levels of S100A9, CCL5, and other indicators such as GLB, ALB, and PLR have diagnostic values for NPC. The logistic regression model based on these biomarkers demonstrated robust predictive performance and clinical utility for NPC diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.