Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40032960›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Investigating blood-brain barrier penetration and neurotoxicity of natural products for central nervous system drug development.

Rintaro Kato, Li Zhang, Nivedita Kinatukara, Ruili Huang, Abhinav Asthana, Claire Weber, Menghang Xia, Xin Xu, Pranav Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rintaro KatoNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), 9808 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Li ZhangNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), 9808 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Nivedita KinatukaraNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), 9808 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Ruili HuangNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), 9808 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Abhinav AsthanaNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), 9808 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Claire WeberNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), 9808 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Menghang XiaNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), 9808 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Xin XuNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), 9808 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Pranav ShahNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), 9808 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. pranav.shah@nih.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural Products (NPs) are increasingly utilized worldwide for their potential therapeutic benefits, including central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Studies have shown açai berries mitigating Parkinson's disease progression through dopaminergic neuroprotection via Nrf-2 HO-1 pathways. Ashwagandha, an evergreen shrub, has shown potential as a therapeutic for neurodegenerative disorders via axonal regeneration in Aβ25-35-treated cortical neurons in vitro. In most cases, promising NPs are tested using in vitro assays or simpler systems during the early stages of drug discovery. However, a critical challenge lies in the lack of data on blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration, which is a significant determinant for the successful development of CNS drugs. Our first goal was to test our in-house NP constituent library via the Parallel Artificial Membrane Permeability Assay (PAMPA-BBB), with the aim of understanding their BBB-penetration potential. Of the constituents tested, 255 were found to have moderate to high BBB permeability. Our next goal was to understand if these compounds could exhibit CNS toxicity. Neuronal viability and neurite outgrowth assays were performed with this subset to identify compounds with neurotoxicity potential. Around 35% of compounds tested showed neurite outgrowth inhibition. The habitual and widespread consumption of NPs underscores the importance of subjecting this subset of compounds to additional testing and validation in vivo to ascertain their potential detrimental effects. Understanding BBB permeability and assessing neurotoxicity mechanisms of NPs will significantly benefit the CNS drug discovery community.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsBlood-Brain BarrierCentral Nervous System AgentsDrug DevelopmentAnimalsCell SurvivalCentral Nervous SystemHumansNeuronal OutgrowthNeuronsBiological ProductsCentral Nervous System AgentsCNS drug discoveryNatural products (NPs)Neurite outgrowth assayNeurotoxicityPAMPA-BBB

Identifiers

PMID40032960
PMCPMC11876671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.