ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimized laboratory techniques for assessing the quality of pre-stripped DMEK grafts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DMEK grafts prepared from corneas stored in TISSUE-C and CARRY-C (deswelling medium) show similar viable endothelial cell density.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Corneal Endothelium Regeneration with Decellularized Porcine Corneal Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addressed limitations in calcein-AM-based endothelial viability assays, specifically focusing on pre-stripped DMEK grafts. Key challenges included the suboptimal calcein staining and the incompatibility of the viability assay with subsequent immunofluorescence (IF). Using human corneal grafts, we employed two strategies to optimize calcein staining. Firstly, we improved calcein staining in corneal endothelium by adjusting calcein-AM concentration and diluent, resulting in a threefold increase in fluorescence intensity with 4 µM calcein in Opti-MEM compared to the conventional 2 µM calcein in PBS. Secondly, introducing the trypan blue (TB) post-viability assay greatly reduced non-specific fluorescence, enhancing the contrast of calcein staining. This improvement significantly and importantly decreased both inter-operator's variability and the time required for viability counting. For the subsequent double IF, an extensive wash is recommended on the fixed and permeabilized graft after the viability assay, which was carried out using Hoechst-Calcein (HC) labeling. The simple technical tips outlined in this study are not only effective for pre-stripped DMEK grafts but may also prove beneficial for other types of corneal grafts, such as PK and DSAEK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.