ArticleScientific reports2025
Application of explainable machine learning for estimating direct and diffuse components of solar irradiance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measurement and forecasting of the diffuse fraction of solar irradiance using a hybrid stacking model in Saudi Arabia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dynamic solar irradiance estimation for vehicle thermal management using a multi-modal machine learning framework.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- DOD-Boost: a temporal and distribution-optimized deep boosting framework for solar radiation modeling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The inclusion of diffuse horizontal irradiance (DHI) and direct normal irradiance (DNI) is crucial in the context of solar energy applications. However, most solar irradiance instruments primarily prioritize the measurement of global horizontal irradiance (GHI) due to the high cost associated with devices used to measure DNI and DHI. Hence, numerous prior works have investigated various solar decomposition models aimed at computing direct and diffuse irradiance from GHI. The present study introduces a novel separation approach for direct and diffuse irradiance, employing machine learning algorithms and utilizing data with a temporal resolution of 1 min. Three machine learning models utilizing the gradient boost technique are suggested and trained using data collected from 10 stations across the world with different climate conditions. The machine learning model called CatBoost outperforms all the solar decomposition models at every station. It achieves the lowest root mean squared error (RMSE) of 8.73% when calculating DNI. The concept of explainable machine learning is further explored through the utilization of shapley additive explanations (SHAP), which allows for the assessment of the significance and interaction of the input parameters. In summary, the results of this study reveal that humidity is an important parameter for the estimation of DNI and DHI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.