ArticleScientific reports2025
Dietary patterns and risk of all-cause mortality in individuals with dyslipidemia based on a prospective cohort in Guizhou China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary intake and sources of sodium and potassium, and salt-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours among rural adults in China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype in relation to diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases in the Indonesian and Korean populations: evidence from two national surveys.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeath in dyslipidemia is a significant health problem, dietary intervention plays an important role in this context.
objectiveOur study investigated the association between dietary patterns and all-cause mortality in individuals with dyslipidemia. This will lay a foundation for the relevant departments to develop more precise and targeted dietary strategies and help high-risk people with early prevention by adjusting their dietary patterns, which may reduce their mortality and reduce the medical burden.
methodsThis study included 5369 participants. Factor analysis identified distinct dietary patterns, each categorized into tertiles based on factor scores: low, medium, and high. Cox proportional hazards regression models were estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the association between dietary patterns and all-cause mortality in individuals with dyslipidemia.
resultsOver a median follow-up of 12.61 years, 365 deaths occurred among the 5369 participants. Four primary dietary patterns were identified. We found that compared to the lowest tertile, the highest tertile of the equilibrium pattern (HR=0.740, 95%CI: 0.565~0.969) and the aquatic products and poultry high loadings pattern (HR=0.757, 95%CI: 0.575~0.997) were negatively correlated with all-cause mortality. Conversely, the grain-tuber and vegetables high loadings pattern (HR=1.338, 95%CI: 1.031~1.737) was positively correlated with all-cause mortality. The oil and salt high loadings pattern (HR=0.973, 95%CI: 0.747~1.268) was not statistically significant.
conclusionsThe equilibrium pattern and the aquatic products and poultry high loadings pattern were linked to a lower risk of all-cause mortality among individuals with dyslipidemia, whereas the grain-tuber and vegetables high loadings pattern was linked to a higher risk. The results implying that adopting appropriate dietary pattern could provide survival benefit for individuals with dyslipidemia. However, this study has only considered dietary intake at baseline, and future research should consider the dynamic changes in dietary habits over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.