ArticleScientific reports2025
Integration of Gaussian process regression and K means clustering for enhanced short term rainfall runoff modeling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated multiobjective optimization of RFSSW parameters for AA2024-T3 using ANOVA machine learning and NSGA II.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrated use of finite element analysis and gaussian process regression in the structural analysis of AISI 316 stainless steel chimney systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate rainfall-runoff modeling is crucial for effective watershed management, hydraulic infrastructure safety, and flood mitigation. However, predicting rainfall-runoff remains challenging due to the nonlinear interplay between hydro-meteorological and topographical variables. This study introduces a hybrid Gaussian process regression (GPR) model integrated with K-means clustering (GPR-K-means) for short-term rainfall-runoff forecasting. The Orgeval watershed in France serves as the study area, providing hourly precipitation and streamflow data spanning 1970-2012. The performance of the GPR-K-means model is compared with standalone GPR and principal component regression (PCR) models across four forecasting horizons: 1-hour, 6-hour, 12-hour, and 24-hour ahead. The results reveal that the GPR-K-means model significantly improves forecasting accuracy across all lead times, with a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of approximately 0.999, 0.942, 0.891, and 0.859 for 1-hour, 6-hour, 12-hour, and 24-hour forecasts, respectively. These results outperform other ML models, such as Long Short-Term Memory, Support Vector Machines, and Random Forest, reported in the literature. The GPR-K-means model demonstrates enhanced reliability and robustness in hourly streamflow forecasting, emphasizing its potential for broader application in hydrological modeling. Furthermore, this study provides a novel methodology for combining clustering and Bayesian regression techniques in surface hydrology, contributing to more accurate and timely flood prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.