ArticleScientific reports2025
Geostatistical analysis and multivariate assessment of groundwater quality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From contamination to decision-making: integrated indices and multivariate analysis for groundwater health risk assessment.Journal of water and health · 2026Article
- Spatio-temporal patterns of land use and land cover, and their impact on groundwater quality in the industrialized Muvattupuzha basin.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Kernel principal component analysis-based water quality index modelling for coastal aquifers in Saudi Arabia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Determination of Groundwater Vulnerability for Protection of the Drinking Water Basins: A Case Study From Türkiye, Kesikköprü Dam Lake Basin.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2025Article
- Environmental Risk Assessment of Metals in Groundwater in an Area of Jiujiang City, Jiangxi Province, China.Toxics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Appraising groundwater quality is critical for identifying health-related risks and establishing foundations for safe water supply management. Traditional statistical analyses of groundwater quality often overlook spatial information and autocorrelation, which are essential for comprehensive assessment. This study examines 76 water samples collected from Tehsil Jaranwala, analyzing 12 water quality parameters (WQPs) through multivariate statistical techniques and a non-parametric geostatistical kriging approach. We estimate the variogram parameters using three techniques: Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE), and Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML), selecting the method with the lowest mean square error for further analysis. These parameters are incorporated into kriging techniques to predict WQPs at unmeasured locations. Contour plots generated via the R software package geoR provide a visual representation of ungauged locations, highlighting the most critical areas. This case study revealed that eight significant WQPs, including Electrical Conductivity (EC), Sulfate, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), Sodium, Chloride, Bicarbonate, Alkalinity, and Fluoride, were present in concentrations higher than the World Health Organization (WHO) permissible limits in certain regions of Jaranwala. Specifically, elevated contamination levels were observed in areas between the north longitude of 73.15°-73.20° and east latitude of 31.80°-32°. These findings underscore the potential health risks associated with groundwater consumption in this area and provide a foundation for informed policy decisions to mitigate these risks. These visualizations are intended to assist government agencies in making informed decisions and implementing necessary actions and policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.