Trial reportScientific reports2025
A clinical trial of curcumin effect in comparison to metronidazole on the treatment of bacterial vaginosis.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intravaginal Formulation Strategies for Vaginal Disorders: Optimizing Phytochemical and Biological Preparations-A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- β-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complexes of Curcumin and Synthetic Analogues in PVA/Carrageenan Hydrogels: A Platform for Sustained Release and Microbial Control.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the prevailing infection. With the growing resistance of vaginal infections to routinely prescribed antibiotics, herbal medicine can be helpful. Researchers have conducted to compare the efficacy of curcumin and metronidazole in the treatment of BV as natural product. This study was a double-blind randomized clinical trial that involving 100 married women aged 18-49 who were not pregnant that sought treatment at two private outpatient clinics from January to September 2021 recruited in study. Individuals who met Amsel's clinical and paraclinical criteria for BV were randomly allocated to the intervention or control groups. Both groups were instructed to take their respective medications every 12 h for seven days. Subsequently, two weeks following the treatment, the efficacy of the treatment was assessed utilizing Amsel's clinical and paraclinical criteria. The data was analyzed using SPSS 26. The data was analyzed using the intention-to-treat (ITT) approach. The clinical (discharge (RD: 0.21; CI
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.