ReviewNature communications2025
The pathways of secretory cargo export at the endoplasmic reticulum.
Review in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remaking an exit: dynamic regulation of ER exit sites by post-translational modifications.Trends in cell biology · 2026Review
- Procollagen 1 assembles into phase-separated condensates in the endoplasmic reticulum.The Journal of cell biology · 2026Article
- Tissue-selective COPII modulator SEC16B aggravates cardiovascular disease by promoting lipid export.The EMBO journal · 2026Article
- Dimeric architecture and membrane thinning govern substrate recognition by human signal peptide peptidase.Research square · 2026Article
- Site-specific glycosylation of Sec24D and myoferlin recruit ERGIC to ER exit sites for collagen trafficking.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Physiological implications of phase separation in vesicle organization and trafficking.BMC biology · 2026Review
- Classification and biogenesis of vesicles, and their roles in the transport of viral components.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Models of Intracellular Transport: Contradictions and Current Understanding.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2026Review
- Decoding the impact of lipid saturation on ER signaling networks, ERSU, UPR, and ERAD.PloS one · 2026Article
- Towards a unified framework for the function of endoplasmic reticulum exit sites.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025Review
- Targeting proteostasis for cancer therapy: current advances, challenges, and future perspectives.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Collagen Biosynthesis and Its Molecular Ensemble: What Remains Unexplored.Biochemistry · 2025Review
- Vesicular trafficking and cell-cell communication in neurodevelopment and neurodegeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Palade's original model proposed that secretory cargo is transported between stable compartments via vesicles. However, recent findings challenge this view, suggesting that secretory pathway compartments are dynamic, with cargo itself dictating whether transfer occurs via vesicles or through the continuity and maturation of compartmental structures. At the heart of this process is TANGO1, a key component of a molecular machine that works in concert with COPII proteins to construct export routes tailored to the size and quantity of secretory cargo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.