ArticleScientific reports2025
Flood vulnerability assessment in the Ili River Basin based on the comprehensive symmetric Kullback-Leibler distance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In vulnerability assessments, accurately determining the indicator weights is essential to ensure the results' precision and reliability. This paper proposes an optimized comprehensive symmetric Kullback-Leibler (K-L) distance weighting method, in which the comprehensive symmetric K-L distance for each indicator is calculated using a grid-based approach, and the normalized distance serves as the weight for each indicator. ArcGIS software was employed to assess the Ili River Basin flood vulnerability as a case study. The results reveal the following: (1) The grid-based optimized symmetric K-L distance method facilitated variable weight processing in the disaster assessments, where it offered a scientific and adaptable approach for indexing and weighting the Ili River Basin flood vulnerability, thus improving both the evaluation accuracy and practicality. (2) The spatial distribution of the Ili River Basin flood vulnerability levels was uneven, with higher vulnerability observed in the northwestern, southwestern, and southeastern regions, and lower vulnerability in the eastern and northeastern areas. Yining County, Yining City, and certain southern regions of Cocodala City were particularly vulnerable due to multiple influencing factors, including the population, economy, and society. These areas require focused attention and preventive measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.