Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40032824›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

EnhanceCenter for improving point based tracking and rich feature representation.

Hyun-Sung Yang, Sung-Wook Park, Se-Hoon Jung, Chun-Bo Sim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hyun-Sung YangInterdisciplinary Program in IT-Bio Convergence System, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, 57922, Korea.
Sung-Wook ParkInterdisciplinary Program in IT-Bio Convergence System, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, 57922, Korea.
Se-Hoon JungDepartment of Computer Engineering, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, 57922, Korea. shjung@scnu.ac.kr.
Chun-Bo SimInterdisciplinary Program in IT-Bio Convergence System, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, 57922, Korea. cbsim@scnu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we propose EnhanceCenter, a multiple-object tracking model that demonstrates enhanced tracking efficiency and stability while reducing dependencies on computationally intensive detectors. EnhanceCenter, based on the CenterTrack method, introduces three key improvements. First, a channel-spatial-spatial feature fusion module effectively utilizes object appearance information, enhancing tracking in complex scenes. Second, the backbone network weights are optimized for multiple-object tracking tasks, enabling more effective feature extraction. Lastly, an improved association method increases long-term tracking stability, maintaining consistency during occlusions or detection failures. Experiments on various MOT benchmarks demonstrated the performance of EnhanceCenter against models using high-performance detectors. On the MOT17 test set, EnhanceCenter outperformed CenterTrack with a 1.6% improvement in IDF1 and achieved a HOTA of 55.1%, surpassing leading center-point-based tracking studies, such as TransTrack and TransCenter. The MOT20 dataset showed a significant 13% improvement in IDF1 compared to CenterTrack. This research underscores the potential of lightweight detectors in achieving state-of-the-art multiple-object tracking performance, paving the way for more efficient tracking solutions in complex environments.

Indexed as

CenterTrackEnhanceCenterLightweight detectorMulti-object tracking

Identifiers

PMID40032824
PMCPMC11876356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.