ArticleDermatology and therapy2025
Analysis of PEST Questionnaire Responses in Patients with Psoriasis in Daily Practice: Results from a Single-Center of Psoriasis in the Czech Republic.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Study on Early Screening and Disease Characteristics of Psoriatic Arthritis Based on PEST Questionnaire and Musculoskeletal Ultrasound.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Psoriasis.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPsoriatic arthritis (PsA) affects 10-30% of individuals with psoriasis. Early detection of PsA is crucial to prevent potential irreversible joint damage. The Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) has proven to be an effective tool in daily clinical practice, but limited data is available on the analysis of positive responses. Our study aimed to determine the combination of positive responses to individual questions and characterize patients with positive PEST results based on specific anatomical sites of psoriasis, duration of the disease, and epidemiological parameters that could potentially predict PEST positivity.
methodsThe PEST questionnaire was randomly administered to patients with psoriasis without psoriatic arthritis attending the outpatient unit for psoriasis treatment. A total of 351 patients completed the PEST questionnaire over a 24-month period. Patients undergoing various types of therapy were included. Each patient completed the PEST questionnaire once, and epidemiological data (such as age, weight, height, body mass index, smoking status, age of disease onset, disease duration, and family history of psoriasis) were collected, as well as types of therapy.
resultsWe included 242 men and 109 women with an average age of 49.4 years and duration of psoriasis of 23.3 years. A positive PEST questionnaire result was found in 28.5% of patients; 13.1% had a score of 3, 8.0% a score of 4 and 7.4% a score of 5. Nail psoriasis, higher age, and therapy with biological/targeted therapy were associated with PEST positivity. The most frequently observed positive response was nail involvement.
conclusionThe PEST questionnaire is a well-established screening tool for identifying patients at risk of having undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis in daily dermatological practice. Patients with nail involvement, higher age, or treated with modern systemic therapy should be closely monitored, as these factors indicate a higher risk of a positive PEST result and consequently higher risk of having psoriatic arthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.