ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
Identification of Novel Biomarkers for Malignant Thyroid Nodules: A Preliminary Study Based on Ultrasound Omics.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Optimized Image Biomarker Identification for Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma Diagnosis Using Image-Enhanced Versus White-Light Endoscopy.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Article
- Navigating the complexity of current interventional radiological approaches for distant metastases in thyroid cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThe identification of thyroid nodules primarily relies on the ultrasound physician's assessment of nodule morphology and other visually identifiable features. Ultrasound omics technology can reveal additional features that are not visible to the naked eye, which may assist in the evaluation of malignant thyroid nodules. This study aims to explore novel markers for malignant thyroid nodules using ultrasound omics and machine learning (ML) techniques.
methodsA total of 1056 thyroid nodules with confirmed pathology were included, comprising 469 malignant and 587 benign cases. Traditional ultrasound features, such as "aspect ratio," "shape," "margins," "blood flow signal," and "calcification pattern," were recorded. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn for each ultrasound image, and features were extracted using the Python-based pyRadiomics tool. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) algorithm and correlation analysis were applied to select relevant features. Data were divided into training and testing sets at an 80:20 ratio. Various ML algorithms were employed to construct the models, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to assess feature importance.
resultsA total of 104 ultrasonic omics features were extracted from each image, and seven ultrasonic omics markers for thyroid malignant nodules were identified. The model developed using the random forest (RF) algorithm performed best on the test set, achieving accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) values of 89.6%, 90.2%, 89.2%, and 89.7%, respectively. However, when the seven ultrasonic omics markers were excluded from the ML features, the model performance decreased to 83.5%, 80.4%, 85.8%, and 83.1%. SHAP analysis indicated that all seven markers were significant features.
conclusionThese novel ultrasonic omics markers may improve the accuracy of thyroid nodule diagnosis, and further research is needed to confirm their clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40032790What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.