ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Contraception Use in Adolescents and Young Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "Contraception Use in Adolescents and Young Adults with Congenital Heart Disease".Pediatric cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Women with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at elevated risk for morbidity and mortality during childbirth. Pediatric cardiologists are in a unique position to provide reproductive counseling to their patients with CHD. We evaluated contraception use in adolescents and young adults with CHD seen in a pediatric cardiology practice. Utilizing retrospective chart review, we evaluated all encounters for female patients aged 14 - 21 years with CHD between January 2017 and June 2023 at a tertiary care center. Female patients without CHD seen over the same period were included as a comparator group. Logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of contraception use. There were 12, 368 visits included in our study. Of the 9924 visits in patients without CHD, 23% were on contraception, and of the 2444 visits in patients with CHD, 22% were on contraception. There was an increase in contraception use over time. Controlling for age at visit, later visit year was associated with contraception use (OR 1.09 [95% CI 1.04-10.9] per year). CHD was associated with lower likelihood of contraception use [OR 0.79 [95% CI 0.70 - 0.88]). Those with single ventricle (SV) CHD and complex CHD used long-acting reversible contraception more often (54% and 46% respectively) compared to those with simple or moderate CHD (17% and 16% respectively) or no CHD (18%). Patients with CHD are receiving contraception at a lower rate than those without CHD. Given the risks that women with CHD face with pregnancy, there should be a dedicated effort to increase the percentage of women with CHD on contraception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.