Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40032683›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2025

Institutional Design of Forest Landscape Restoration in Central Togo: Informing Policy-making through Q Methodology Analysis.

Hamza Moluh Njoya, Kossi Hounkpati, Kossi Adjonou, Kouami Kokou, Stefan Sieber, Katharina Löhr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hamza Moluh NjoyaLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Sustainable Land Use in Developing Countries, 15374, Müncheberg, Germany. Hamza.Moluh-Njoya@zalf.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5067-2871
Kossi HounkpatiLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Sustainable Land Use in Developing Countries, 15374, Müncheberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0212-7331
Kossi AdjonouForest Research Laboratory, Climate Change Research Centre, University of Lomé, 1515, Lome, Togo.ORCID 0000-0001-8491-8107
Kouami KokouForest Research Laboratory, Climate Change Research Centre, University of Lomé, 1515, Lome, Togo.ORCID 0000-0002-2400-0852
Stefan SieberLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Sustainable Land Use in Developing Countries, 15374, Müncheberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4849-7277
Katharina LöhrLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Sustainable Land Use in Developing Countries, 15374, Müncheberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2691-9712

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forest landscape restoration (FLR) is a promising tool for restoring ecological functionality and improving human well-being in degraded landscapes. The success of FLR efforts depends on the interests, perceptions, and actions of local communities, extension services, Non-Governmental Organizations, and policymakers. While much research focuses on the direct ecological and economic impacts of FLR, limited attention has been given to how stakeholder perceptions influence the design and implementation of restoration efforts. Understanding these perspectives is crucial for shaping effective policy interventions and ensuring long-term FLR success. This study uses Q methodology to examine stakeholder viewpoints on key considerations and priorities for designing and implementing FLR in Tchamba Prefecture, Togo. The analysis reveals three distinct perspectives: (1) Incentive-Driven Restoration, emphasizing financial incentives and private-sector partnerships as essential for FLR success; (2) Comprehensive and Collaborative Restoration, advocating for an inclusive, multidisciplinary approach that integrates community participation and long-term monitoring; and (3) Incentive-Driven Community Restoration, highlighting the importance of economic incentives in fostering local engagement. Across all perspectives, stakeholders strongly agreed on the importance of biodiversity conservation, stakeholder involvement, and conflict resolution in land use. The findings underscore the need to tailor FLR policies to local contexts and stakeholder preferences, suggesting that flexible, participatory approaches can enhance sustainability and effectiveness. This study contributes to developing inclusive, adaptive restoration policies and highlights the need to integrate behavioural insights into policy-making to foster long-term stakeholder engagement.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationForestsPolicy MakingBiodiversityCommunity ParticipationHumansStakeholder ParticipationTogoCommunity engagementForest landscape restorationPolicy designQ methodologyStakeholder perceptions

Identifiers

PMID40032683
PMCPMC12033111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.