ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
The reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle may contribute to overt inferior inclination: comparison with alternative parameters.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of radiographic viewing perspective on the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle.Seminars in arthroplasty · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRadiographic measurements have gained wide acceptance in anticipating the risk of inappropriate glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This study aims to investigate whether the RSA angle overcorrects the base plate inclination, tilting it inferiorly, compared to the base plate correction angle (BCA), which provides neutral inclination and lateralization.
methodsOne hundred normal anteroposterior shoulder radiographs were evaluated to determine the average values of the RSA angle, BCA, base plate orientation angle (BOA), and the base plate shoulder angle (BSA), which represents the amount of overcorrection accomplished via the RSA angle beyond the BCA's scope. The interobserver reliability among two independent testers was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient. A t-test was applied to compare the mean values of the BCA and RSA angle.
resultsThe mean BOA and BCA values were 118° ± 5.7° and 17° ± 4.6°, respectively. The RSA angle value was 23° ± 6°. Compared to the BCA, the RSA angle overcorrected the base plate inclination by 15° ± 5° (BSA). The Student's t-test showed a statistically significant difference between the values of the BCA and RSA angle (p-value = 0.000). The interobserver reliability was excellent for all angle measurements among two independent testers.
conclusionThe RSA angle and the BOA/BCA are reliable radiographic measurements to determine the inclination of the inferior glenoid segment prior to RSA. However, surgeons need to consider the inherent inferior inclination associated with positioning the base plate according to the RSA angle (15° ± 5°).
Indexed as
Identifiers
40032672What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.