Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40032398›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Naturalistic trial of nudging patients and clinicians in the Norwegian sickness absence clinics: a study protocol for the NSAC Nudge Study.

Nils Abel Aars, Ingvild Bardal, B Brinchmann, Arnstein Mykletun

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05006976 (A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Patients and Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinics- The NSAC Nudge Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05006976 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Patients and Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinics- The NSAC Nudge Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNordlandssykehuset HFRan2021 to 2033Enrolled1,180ConditionsMusculoskeletal Disorder, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, FatigueArmsNSAC health only, NSAC health + MBW
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nils Abel AarsCentre for Work and Mental Health, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway nils.abel.aars@nordlandssykehuset.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0447-2668
Ingvild BardalCentre for Work and Mental Health, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway.
B BrinchmannCentre for Work and Mental Health, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway.
Arnstein MykletunCentre for Work and Mental Health, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3878-0079

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCommon mental disorders and musculoskeletal disorders are the leading causes of sickness absence and disability. There has been a rise in work-focused clinical interventions and studies investigating whether general clinical services can increase employment and reduce sickness absence. However, evidence supporting a clinical approach to preventing sickness absence and improving return to work remains limited. This is a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial, the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic Nudge Study (NSAC Nudge Study), which aims to investigate the effect of including questionnaires on motivation for work, barriers for return to work and work environment to patients and the provision of a summary of responses to clinicians prior to consultation, on return to work, prevention of sickness absence and alleviation of symptoms.

methodsThe NSAC Nudge Study is a multicentre naturalistic randomised controlled trial conducted at five outpatient clinics admitting patients on-or at risk of sickness absence due to common mental-and/or musculoskeletal disorders in Northern Norway. The study commenced on 6 September 2021 and aimed to recruit 1100 patients. Recruitment concluded on 12 January 2023, at which point 1171 patients had been enrolled. The patients were randomised in equal proportions to receive either of two questionnaires prior to treatment; a questionnaire mapping health factors only, or a questionnaire mapping health factors and factors related to motivation for work, barriers for return to work and motivation for work. Data sources include survey data from both patients and clinicians, as well as 20 years of retrospective and prospective data from national registries on healthcare utilisation, sickness absence, employment and benefits. ANALYSES: In this protocol, we describe a trial aiming to facilitate and improve return to work, prevention of sickness absence and alleviation of symptoms for patients with common mental health and/or musculoskeletal disorders through a nudge. The study findings will serve as validation of an implemented programme for this patient group and inform decisions on how the programme may be adapted to increase its efficacy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Regional Committee for Medical Research (REC North), grant number #285 489. Results from the study will be communicated to the participating HelseIArbeid outpatient clinics and other relevant stakeholders and disseminated through scientific publications and presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05006976.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMotivationMusculoskeletal DiseasesReturn to WorkSick LeaveAbsenteeismAdultHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNorwayRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth WorkforceMENTAL HEALTHMusculoskeletal disordersPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID40032398
PMCPMC11877198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.