ArticleBMJ open2025
Awareness of risk when prescribing and taking combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs): a qualitative study with women and health professionals in three European countries.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the experiences of women and health professionals when communicating about combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs), with a focus on venous thromboembolism (VTE). We also focused on information sources consulted by women for their decision-making process regarding contraceptives.
designQualitative semistructured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 24 women and 16 health professionals. The study followed a phenomenological approach, and data were synthesised using the framework analysis method.
settingCommunity health centres across three countries in the UK, Denmark, and Slovakia.
participantsAdult (aged 18+) women using CHC and health professionals eligible to prescribe CHC in their respective countries.
resultsWomen tended to be positive about CHC's safety and seek information about CHC through their health professionals, family and friends. They would like to receive further information from health professionals, particularly when it comes to risks of CHC and alternative methods of contraception. Health professionals reported using a variety of methods to communicate about CHC and generally report giving advice based on national and local guidelines. In line with women's perspectives, they reported time constraints and lack of resources as barriers to communication about CHC. Health professionals in our sample believed there is a lack of standardisation in the information offered and guidelines used to prescribe CHC, with little contact with international regulators such as the European Medicines Agency.
conclusionsIt is necessary to improve the conditions under which contraceptive counselling is provided, as well as supporting health professionals in this task. Exploring the lived experiences of women and health professionals about how they discuss contraception choices can shed light on the best approaches to improve reproductive health consultations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.