ArticleBMJ open2025
Socioeconomic determinants potentially underlying differential global SARS-CoV-2 testing capacity: an ecological study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Significant but small: the modest impact of population ageing on reported COVID-19 case rates worldwide.Future science OA · 2026Article
- Employment type and non-compliance with SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing: insights from a nationwide seroprevalence study in South Korea.BMJ open · 2026Article
- One Health in Mesoamerica: historical legacies, current challenges, and strategic directions.One health outlook · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo analyse the relationships between SARS-CoV-2 laboratory testing capacity (TC) and socioeconomic factors (wealth, governance and social inequality) across 109 countries in 2020-2021, to identify potential determinants of global disparities in TC during the COVID-19 pandemic.
designAn ecological study using regression analyses to explore the associations between TC and socioeconomic determinants within and across global regions. SETTING/
participantsData from 109 countries from Our World in Data, the WHO, the United Nations and others grouped into six geographic and sociodemographic regions (global burden of disease regions), were analysed separately for the years 2020-2021 based on differential vaccine availability and country-level responses throughout the pandemic. OUTCOME MEASURES: Relationships between SARS-CoV-2 TC and factors such as vaccination rates, wealth, vulnerable employment (VE), gender and income inequality within and across world regions in 2020-2021.
resultsTC increased a minimum of 2.1-fold for 'Sub-Sahara' (median TC 1800-3700 tests) to a maximum of 4.9-fold for 'Asia and Oceania' (4500-22 000) between 2020 and 2021. Factors associated with TC among the socioeconomic variables included VE that was associated with reduced TC both in 2020 (relative change (RC) -43%; 95% CI -57% to -25%) and 2021 (RC -46%; 95% CI -62% to -24%) and employment-to-population ratio that had a positive effect on TC in 2021 (RC 27%; 95% CI 44% to 55%). Socioeconomic variables showed similar patterns for both the established measles-mumps-rubella and the new COVID-19 vaccines. Region-level analyses revealed stark heterogeneity in the associations between socioeconomic variables and TC between the analysed years (2020 vs 2021) and across regions. Region-specific trends showed that in Latin America and Asia/Oceania, TC was linked to health expenditure in both analysed years (RC
conclusionsSocioeconomic and gender inequalities play a significant role in determining SARS-CoV-2 TC. These inequalities underscore the necessity of ensuring equitable access to health services and targeted public health interventions, particularly in resource-limited settings, to improve health outcomes and pandemic preparedness. Socioeconomic and gender disparities can exacerbate health inequalities and hinder the effectiveness of public health policies in a globally interconnected world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.