ArticleBMJ open2025
Biochemical use of neurofilament light polypeptide and vitamin B
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Screening and monitoring of diabetic polyneuropathy in clinical practice: present and future with connected devices.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study was to investigate serum Neurofilament Light polypeptide (NfL) as a biomarker for diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Secondarily, to investigate vitamin B RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsCross-sectional study. Sixty Danish adolescents with T1D (age 15-18 years, diabetes duration >5 years) and 23 age-matched control subjects were included. Based on nerve conduction studies (NCS), intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) and neurological examination, patients were divided into three groups: (1) T1D without DPN, (2) T1D with subclinical DPN and (3) T1D with confirmed DPN. Blood levels of NfL, B
resultsTwenty-four of the adolescents were without DPN, twenty-one had subclinical DPN and eight had confirmed DPN. NCS was not conducted in three participants and four patients did not have blood samples taken. There were no significant differences in NfL levels or any of the B
conclusionsNfL used in a cross-sectional manner was not found useful to distinguish between the adolescents with DPN and those without. Vitamin B
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.