ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2025
Assessing complications from retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer in North America.
Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in the treatment of testicular germ cell tumors-Is the robot-assisted technique superior to the open surgical approach?]Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRetroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is a procedure of significant therapeutic and diagnostic value in the management of testicular cancer. This study aimed to conduct a contemporary review of surgical outcomes following RPLND procedures performed in North America over the last decade.
methodsWe queried the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2012-2022 (n=9 857 040) to identify patients who underwent RPLND and were diagnosed with testicular cancer. The primary outcome was 30-day morbidity. Secondary outcomes included time-to-complication analysis, rate of additional organ resection, hospital length of stay (LOS), and readmission rates. Binomial logistic regression and a generalized linear model were used to identify risk factors associated with 30-day morbidity and LOS.
resultsA total of 513 RPLND procedures met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 30 years (interquartile range [IQR] 24-36.50) with a body mass index of 27.9 kg/m
conclusionsThis study underscores that approximately one in six patients experience complications following RPLND in North America. Identifying the timing of and risk factors for these complications can improve physician-patient communication and overall care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.