ArticleOphthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde2025
Networking of Eye Hospitals on a National Level for Promoting and Advancing Conduct of Clinical Trials.
Article in Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe complexity of clinical trials is increasing for both sponsors and study sites. This impacts planning, preparation, implementation, and conduct of all studies. The exchange of experience and cooperation helps centers to better master the various challenges facing ophthalmological study centers. This serves the efficiency of multicenter studies, including timely patient recruitment.
methodsThe DOG (German Society of Ophthalmology) Clinical Study Centers Working Group (WG) was founded in 2011. Since then, regular meetings have been held including the annual during the DOG and meeting. There is also a continuous exchange in between these meetings. Symposia are regularly held at the DOG conferences together with industry and regulatory authorities. A range of courses on the conduct clinical trials has been established, and joint publications and DOG recommendations are regularly generated.
resultsSince its foundation, the WG has tremendously gained visibility and popularity. Its members have increased from 40 (2011) to 80 (2024). Study-specific recommendations were produced early on, which were published by the DOG in German and English language. The topics of the publications and symposia range from study design, budget negotiations, special challenges, publication regulations, and legislation to the attractiveness of Germany as a study location. Since 2023, a patient video of the WG has been available to support and foster recruitment of study patients.
conclusionThe DOG Working Group Clinical Study Centers has become a platform for cooperation and representation of the interests of German ophthalmological study centers. It also represents an important link to industry and is engaged in a lively dialogue to promote Germany as a study location in ophthalmology. The group and its activities may serve as a model for other medical societies and countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.