ArticleSouthern medical journal2025
Where Are Future Doctors Who Southern Rural African Americans Will Trust? A Look Back into Rural Medical Scholars Data.
Article in Southern medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Twenty-five years of Alabama's Rural Health Leaders Pipeline: what difference has it made?Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAfrican Americans' distrust of institutions extends to southern US rural communities, limiting their use of healthcare resources. Local physicians are scarce, and treatable diseases accumulate. These communities want local doctors they can trust, consistent with research promoting culturally concordant doctor-patient relationships. African American student inclusion was a priority of the Rural Health Leaders Pipeline, which included precollege pipeline programs and a professional track (Rural Medical Scholars Program) of a master's degree program and medical education. The purpose of the present study was to review African American students' experience in the professional track to inform future efforts to produce rural African American physicians.
methodsWe retrospectively tracked African Americans in the Rural Medical Scholars Program from 1996 to 2017. Data from pipeline and professional programs supplied racial identity, recruitment mechanism (from pipeline or general admissions), completion of a master's degree program, medical school matriculation, medical school attended, and medical school progression. We counted students for visual analysis with a table for students' distribution and graph for student progression.
resultsIn 21 years, 1045 students participated in the Rural Health Leaders Pipeline-380 (36%) were African American, including 195 high school, 169 posthigh school, and 16 professional track students. Ten (63%) of these African American Rural Medical Scholars had been earlier pipeline students compared with 15% of non-African American peers. All 16 African American Rural Medical Scholars completed the master's program, 12 entered medical school, and 10 progressed successfully, producing one rural African American physician every 2 years. These numbers were too small for statistical analysis.
conclusionsEnthusiasm among preprofessional students and academic success through the master's degree program but so few accessing medical education was the major finding, matching Association of American Medical Colleges' data showing fewer than 0.01% of US medical students are rural African Americans. Interventions beyond recruitment are needed to involve African American students in rural medicine programs to produce culturally concordant physicians whom their communities can trust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.