ArticleIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2025
Evaluation of Neural, Systemic and Extracerebral Activations During Active Walking Tasks in Older Adults Using fNIRS.
Article in IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring brain activity differences in functional constipation using fNIRS: a case-control study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- fNIRS vs. EEG in audiological diagnostics: novel approaches to recording brain responses to auditory stimulation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is being increasingly used to assess brain hemodynamic responses during active walking in older adults due to its wearability, and relative immunity to motion artifacts. Specifically, fNIRS allows for continuous monitoring of brain activations that vary in response to experimental manipulations of cognitive demands during active walking tasks. Studies using fNIRS highlighted increased involvement of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in dual compared to single task walking, operationalized using oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO), due to increasing attention demands inherent in the former task condition in aging and clinical populations. However, current literature utilizing fNIRS in mobility research has not been uniform in terms of fNIRS instrumentation characteristics and the accompanying signal processing methods to separate various signal sources (i.e. neural activations, extracerebral signals, systemic responses) which can raise questions about prior research findings. In our previous studies, we have used a forehead fNIR sensor (fNIR Imager 1100 by fNIR Devices, LLC) with 2.5 cm source detector separation (SDS) at 2 Hz sampling rate which allowed us to reliably evaluate changes in brain activations in the PFC during active walking. However, there exists other fNIRS devices incorporating a number of different types of light sources and detectors allowing multiple channels of long (3 cm SDS) and short (0.8 cm SDS) distance measurements in complex configurations for the monitoring of cognitive activations on various head locations at different depths with higher sampling rates of ~5 Hz (i.e. NIRx sensor, NIR Sport2 by NIRx Medizintechnik GmbH). Such involved designs further allowed the implementation of advanced signal processing algorithms to separate and evaluate neural, systemic and extracerebral signal contributions on the overall measurements. In this study, we collected brain imaging data on a sample of healthy older adults (n =15, age ) under single (STW) and dual task walking (DTW) conditions; participants were evaluated twice during one study visit, once wearing fNIR sensor and a second time while wearing NIRx sensor. This study design allowed us to address critical gaps in the extant literature concerning fNIRS-derived brain activations during active walking. Specifically, we evaluated potential effects of penetration depth as defined by the SDS of the fNIRS device, extracerebral activations (i.e. skin blood flow) and systemic signals (i.e. heart rate) on the observed HbO increases from STW to DTW. Our findings suggested that PFC activation differences between STW and DTW conditions observed in older adults were consistent across fNIRS instrumentations and the observed differences in HbO between STW and DTW were not materially influenced by scalp activations or systemic changes. Nevertheless, efforts to optimize extraction of fNIRS-derived brain signal measurements should continue taking advantage of technological advancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.