ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2025
500 MHz Inductive Birdcage RF Coil for Brain MRI: Design, Implementation and Validation.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe present a 500 MHz inductive birdcage RF resonator for imaging the human brain in an 11.7 T MRI scanner.
methodsA homogenous circularly polarized transmit field ($\text{B}_{1}^{+}$) was generated by transmitting power to the resonator through four couplers driven in differential mode and with an incremental 90-degree phase delay. A detailed mechanical and electrical model of the hardware, loaded with different phantoms, was generated and its performance simulated using a finite-difference time-domain method.
resultsThe head-size inductively coupled birdcage presented a fundamental mode at 500 MHz. MR thermometry maps were in good agreement with heating profiles estimated from simulated SAR maps Conclusion: The model of the hardware was validated through both bench and MRI measurements. SIGNIFICANCE: This validation is important for future analysis of radiofrequency safety and performance at ultra-high field MRI through the prediction of SAR and $\text{B}_{1}^{+}$ profiles across different human brain models at various positions inside the coil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.