ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2025
Marker Data Enhancement for Markerless Motion Capture.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Validations and applications of markerless motion capture using OpenCap: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of Joint Kinematics and Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters Between Markerless and Marker-Based Motion Capture in a Large Knee Osteoarthritis Cohort.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Markerless Motion Capture for Human Movement Estimation Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Pediatric reports · 2026Review
- Quantification of Lower Extremity Dressing Movements in Patients With Stroke.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026Article
- A framework for quantifying the mechanics of dexterous grasp.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Concurrent validation of OpenCap for identifying ACL re-injury risk factors during a drop jump test in a healthy cohort.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Designing tech-ready recreational sport systems: a conceptual analysis of unified and modular architectures.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
- Influence of camera geometry on 3D joint angle estimation in markerless motion capture.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Effect of Walking Speed on the Reliability of a Smartphone-Based Markerless Gait Analysis System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Video-Based Biomechanical Analysis Captures Disease-Specific Movement Signatures of Different Neuromuscular Diseases.NEJM AI · 2025Article
- A Confidence-Based Multibody Kinematics Optimization for Markerless Motion Capture: A Proof of Concept.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- The influence of the marker set on inverse kinematics results to inform markerless motion capture annotations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHuman pose estimation models can measure movement from videos at a large scale and low cost; however, open-source pose estimation models typically detect only sparse keypoints, which leads to inaccurate joint kinematics. OpenCap, a freely available service for researchers to measure movement from videos, mitigates this issue using a deep learning model-the marker enhancer-that transforms sparse video keypoints into dense anatomical markers. However, OpenCap performs poorly on movements not included in the training data. Here, we create a much larger and more diverse training dataset and develop a more accurate and generalizable marker enhancer.
methodsWe compiled marker-based motion capture data from 1176 subjects and synthesized 1433 hours of video keypoints and anatomical markers to train the marker enhancer. We evaluated its accuracy in computing kinematics using both benchmark movement videos and synthetic data representing unseen, diverse movements.
resultsThe marker enhancer improved kinematic accuracy on benchmark movements (mean error: 4.1$^\circ$, max: 8.7$^\circ$) compared to using video keypoints (mean: 9.6$^\circ$, max: 43.1$^\circ$) and OpenCap's original enhancer (mean: 5.3$^\circ$, max: 11.5$^\circ$). It also better generalized to unseen, diverse movements (mean: 4.1$^\circ$, max: 6.7$^\circ$) than OpenCap's original enhancer (mean: 40.4$^\circ$, max: 252.0$^\circ$).
conclusionOur marker enhancer demonstrates both improved accuracy and generalizability across diverse movements. SIGNIFICANCE: We integrated the marker enhancer into OpenCap, thereby offering its thousands of users more accurate measurements across a broader range of movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.