ArticleVaccine2025
Designing a National Rapid Vaccine Coverage Survey in low-resource settings: Experiences from the Democratic Republic of the Congo 2018-2023.
Article in Vaccine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community knowledge, attitudes, and preferences towards vitamin A supplementation in a semi-rural health zone, Kasai Oriental, Democratic Republic of the Congo: a mixed-methods study.Global health action · 2026Article
- Article
- Trends in vaccination coverage and equity in the Democratic Republic of the Congo from 2017 to 2023.Vaccine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), estimating vaccine coverage (VC) has traditionally relied on large-scale surveys such as the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS). However, these surveys are infrequent, costly, and lack the granularity needed for decision-making at the health district or zone (HZ) level. This paper describes the development by the Kinshasa School of Public Health (KSPH), and technical partners of a Vaccine Coverage Survey (KSPH VCS), adapted from the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, which aims to provides timely, cost-effective, and representative estimates of VC at the HZ level. The KSPH VCS adopted a cross-sectional design and a multi-stage sampling approach to sample households at the HZ level. It uses Health Area as cluster in spite of Enumeration Area, and extends the eligibility age range from 12 -23 months to 6-23 months. The sample size for each HZ was calculated using vaccine coverage provided in MICS-2018. It integrates assessments of barriers and enablers to vaccination. Since 2023, it has included malaria indicators. Since its inception in 2018, it has expanded nationwide, covering all 26 provinces of the DRC by 2022. Findings from the KSPH VCS provides estimates at the HZ level that could be combined to provincial and national estimates. Results have been instrumental in evaluating national immunization strategies, including the Mashako Plan and informing Presidential Forums on immunization. They have informed resource allocation, operational planning, and policy decisions at both national and provincial levels as they provided granularity needed for operational decision-making at the HZ level. Its results have also contributed to global immunization estimates, including the WHO/UNICEF Estimates of National Immunization Coverage (WUENIC). The KSPH VCS demonstrates the feasibility of a locally led, cost-effective, and adaptable VC survey in a low-resource setting. Its success highlights the potential for similar methodologies to be implemented in other low- and middle-income countries seeking to improve immunization monitoring and health system performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.