ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2025
A Physics-Based Computational Forward Model for Efficient Image Reconstruction in Magnetic Particle Imaging.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design, verification and validation of a spatially confined magnetic nanoparticle thermal therapy device for conformal thermal dose contouring.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2026Article
- Hyper-Intense Tumor Peripheral Accumulation of Antibody-Conjugated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles can Enable Breast Cancer Detection by Magnetic Particle Imaging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Systematic evaluation of magnetic particle imaging quantification strategies in biologically relevant scenarios using anatomically correct 3D printed mouse phantoms.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Magnetic particle imaging tracers for human applications: preclinical in vivo evaluation of Magtrace, Resotran, and FerroTrace.Npj imaging · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle retention enables non-invasive detection of metastases by magnetic particle imaging in murine breast cancer models.Theranostics · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article derives and implements a computational physics model for model-based image reconstruction in magnetic particle imaging (MPI) applications. To our knowledge, this is the first ever computationally tractable model-based image reconstruction in MPI, which is neither constructed from calibration or simulation experiments or limited to specific scan acquisition geometries. The derived model results in a system constructed from a series of fast linear transforms, each of which incorporate the individual components from the paramagnetic model. These include the field free point velocity and location, gradient strength, receive coil sensitivity, and receive chain filtering. Each of these modeling components are amendable to any changes in the acquisition parameters. This allows us to adopt a computationally tractable system matrix modeling approach to MPI for any scan specific parameters at very high pixel resolutions. The model is derived from first principles, and it results from taking the fundamental MPI signal theory and decomposing these modeling equations into the series of linear transforms acting on a pixelated image. Each transform is formally defined in matrix form but implemented in a matrix-free fashion with fast and/or sparse operations. For these reasons, our new model should be a fundamental tool in the future of computational imaging in MPI. We demonstrate our new method on a variety of pre-clinical and simulated data sets, and these results confirm that our method is both efficient and accurate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.