ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2025
Scaling Synthetic Brain Data Generation.
Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MindGrab: A spectrally-motivated architecture for accessible deep learning in neuroimaging.NeuroImage · 2026Article
- Domain-Randomized Deep Learning for Neuroimage Analysis: Selecting Training Strategies, Navigating Challenges, and Maximizing Benefits.IEEE signal processing magazine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The limited availability of diverse, high-quality datasets is a significant challenge in applying deep learning to neuroimaging research. Although synthetic data generation can potentially address this issue, on-the-fly generation is computationally demanding, while training on pre-generated data is inflexible and may incur high storage costs. We introduce Wirehead, a scalable in-memory data pipeline that significantly improves the performance of on-the-fly synthetic data generation for deep learning in neuroimaging. Wirehead's architecture decouples data generation from training by running multiple generators in independent parallel processes, facilitating near-linear performance gains proportional to the number of generators used. It efficiently handles terabytes of data using MongoDB, greatly minimizing prohibitive storage costs. The robust, modular design enables flexible pipeline configurations and fault-tolerant operation. We evaluated Wirehead with SynthSeg, a synthetic brain segmentation data generation tool that requires 7 days to train a model. When deployed in parallel, Wirehead achieved a near-linear 15.7x increase in throughput with 16 generators. With 20 generators, we can train a model in 9 hours instead of 7 days. This demonstrates Wirehead's ability to greatly accelerate experimentation cycles. While Wirehead represents a substantial step forward, it also reveals opportunities for future research in optimizing generation-training balance and resource allocation. Its ability to facilitate distributed deep learning has significant implications for enabling more ambitious neuroimaging research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.