Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40030742›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2025

Scaling Synthetic Brain Data Generation.

Mike Doan, Sergey Plis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mike Doan
Sergey Plis

Funding

Multivariate methods for identifying multitask/multimodal brain imaging biomarkersR01EB006841 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI VINCE D CALHOUN, Sergey Plis · 2007 to 2026
$9.8M
CRCNS: Multimodal Dynamic Causal Learning for NeuroimagingR01MH129047 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PLIS, SERGEY · 2021 to 2024
$1.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006841NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH129047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The limited availability of diverse, high-quality datasets is a significant challenge in applying deep learning to neuroimaging research. Although synthetic data generation can potentially address this issue, on-the-fly generation is computationally demanding, while training on pre-generated data is inflexible and may incur high storage costs. We introduce Wirehead, a scalable in-memory data pipeline that significantly improves the performance of on-the-fly synthetic data generation for deep learning in neuroimaging. Wirehead's architecture decouples data generation from training by running multiple generators in independent parallel processes, facilitating near-linear performance gains proportional to the number of generators used. It efficiently handles terabytes of data using MongoDB, greatly minimizing prohibitive storage costs. The robust, modular design enables flexible pipeline configurations and fault-tolerant operation. We evaluated Wirehead with SynthSeg, a synthetic brain segmentation data generation tool that requires 7 days to train a model. When deployed in parallel, Wirehead achieved a near-linear 15.7x increase in throughput with 16 generators. With 20 generators, we can train a model in 9 hours instead of 7 days. This demonstrates Wirehead's ability to greatly accelerate experimentation cycles. While Wirehead represents a substantial step forward, it also reveals opportunities for future research in optimizing generation-training balance and resource allocation. Its ability to facilitate distributed deep learning has significant implications for enabling more ambitious neuroimaging research.

Indexed as

BrainDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeuroimagingHumans

Identifiers

PMID40030742
PMCPMC11971006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.