ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2025
Detecting Opioid Use Disorder in Health Claims Data With Positive Unlabeled Learning.
Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detecting Uncoded Self-Harm in Veterans' Electronic Health Records Using Positive and Unlabeled Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Leveraging Ensemble Machine Learning Models for the Detection of Primary Myelofibrosis in Electronic Health Records.Cancers · 2026Article
- Adjusting for Selection Bias Due to Missing Data in Electronic Health Records-Based Research by Blending Multiple Imputation and Inverse Probability Weighting.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- KG2ML: integrating knowledge graphs and positive unlabeled learning for identifying disease-associated genes.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate detection and prevalence estimation of behavioral health conditions, such as opioid use disorder (OUD), are crucial for identifying at-risk individuals, determining treatment needs, monitoring prevention and intervention efforts, and recruiting treatment-naive participants for clinical trials. The availability of extensive health data, combined with advancements in machine learning (ML) frameworks, has enabled researchers to employ various ML techniques to predict or identify OUD within patient health data. Ideally, we could directly estimate the prevalence, or the proportion of a population with a condition over time. However, underdiagnosis and undercoding of conditions in patient health records make it challenging to determine the true prevalence of these conditions and to identify at-risk patients with less severe conditions who are more likely to be missed. Consequently, patients without diagnoses may comprise positive and negative examples for a given condition. Treating all undiagnosed (uncoded) patients as negative when applying ML methods can introduce bias into models, affecting their predictive power. To address this issue, we employed Positive Unlabeled Learning Selected Not At Random (PULSNAR), a Positive and Unlabeled (PU) learning technique, to estimate the probability of a given patient having OUD during a time window and the overall population prevalence of OUD. In a sample of 3,342,044 commercially insured US patients with at least one opioid prescription filled, PULSNAR estimated that 5.08% of patients have a cumulative prevalence of OUD over a 2-5 a observation period, compared to the 1.35% with a recorded OUD diagnosis, with 73.5% of cases not diagnosed/coded. The prevalence estimates provided by PULSNAR are consistent with those reported in other studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.