Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40030473›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2025

Detecting Opioid Use Disorder in Health Claims Data With Positive Unlabeled Learning.

Praveen Kumar, Fariha Moomtaheen, Scott A Malec, Jeremy J Yang, Cristian G Bologa, Kristan A Schneider, Yiliang Zhu, Mauricio Tohen, Gerardo Villarreal, Douglas J Perkins and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Praveen Kumar
Fariha Moomtaheen
Scott A Malec
Jeremy J Yang
Cristian G Bologa
Kristan A Schneider
Yiliang Zhu
Mauricio Tohen
Gerardo Villarreal
Douglas J Perkins
Elliot M Fielstein
Sharon E Davis
Michael E Matheny
Christophe G Lambert

Funding

UNM HSC Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001449 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI CAMPEN, MATTHEW J, PANDHI, NANCY · 2015 to 2024
$36.9M
Deriving high-quality evidence from national healthcare databases to improve suicidality detection and treatment outcomes in PTSDR01MH129764 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Christophe G. Lambert · 2023 to 2026
$2.8M
Using the literature to build causal models of retrospective observational dataR00LM013367 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI MALEC, SCOTT ALEXANDER · 2023 to 2025
$746k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001449NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH129764NLM NIH HHS R00 LM013367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate detection and prevalence estimation of behavioral health conditions, such as opioid use disorder (OUD), are crucial for identifying at-risk individuals, determining treatment needs, monitoring prevention and intervention efforts, and recruiting treatment-naive participants for clinical trials. The availability of extensive health data, combined with advancements in machine learning (ML) frameworks, has enabled researchers to employ various ML techniques to predict or identify OUD within patient health data. Ideally, we could directly estimate the prevalence, or the proportion of a population with a condition over time. However, underdiagnosis and undercoding of conditions in patient health records make it challenging to determine the true prevalence of these conditions and to identify at-risk patients with less severe conditions who are more likely to be missed. Consequently, patients without diagnoses may comprise positive and negative examples for a given condition. Treating all undiagnosed (uncoded) patients as negative when applying ML methods can introduce bias into models, affecting their predictive power. To address this issue, we employed Positive Unlabeled Learning Selected Not At Random (PULSNAR), a Positive and Unlabeled (PU) learning technique, to estimate the probability of a given patient having OUD during a time window and the overall population prevalence of OUD. In a sample of 3,342,044 commercially insured US patients with at least one opioid prescription filled, PULSNAR estimated that 5.08% of patients have a cumulative prevalence of OUD over a 2-5 a observation period, compared to the 1.35% with a recorded OUD diagnosis, with 73.5% of cases not diagnosed/coded. The prevalence estimates provided by PULSNAR are consistent with those reported in other studies.

Indexed as

Machine LearningOpioid-Related DisordersAdultElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40030473
PMCPMC11971012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.