ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Endoscopic endonasal surgery for suprasellar ectopic pituitary neuroendocrine tumors featuring apoplexy and a preoperative differential diagnosis: illustrative cases.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endoscopic endonasal resection of ectopic suprasellar pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: comparison of intra-stalk and extra-stalk tumors. Illustrative cases.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEctopic pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (Pit-NETs) are rare. The authors present two cases of ectopic Pit-NETs located entirely in the suprasellar space without continuity with the normal pituitary gland. OBSERVATIONS: In case 1, a 53-year-old male presented with right blindness and left visual field impairment. Preoperative imaging suggested an ectopic Pit-NET with pituitary apoplexy. Intraoperatively, it was found to originate from the pars tuberalis of the pituitary stalk. A portion of the tumor inside the pituitary stalk was left intact, resulting in subtotal resection. Postoperatively, the patient developed diabetes insipidus (DI), but his left visual function improved. In case 2, a suprasellar tumor was incidentally discovered in a 63-year-old female who presented with a headache. Imaging revealed a tumor with a cystic component, leading to an initial diagnosis of craniopharyngioma. Intraoperatively, the tumor was found to originate from the pituitary stalk. The stalk was divided longitudinally, and total resection was achieved. Pathological diagnosis confirmed Pit-NET. The patient developed transient DI and transient worsening of visual field disturbance, both of which improved within 3 months postoperatively. LESSONS: Ectopic Pit-NETs can occasionally present with apoplexy, and preoperative differential diagnosis can be difficult based on imaging study alone. Intraoperative histopathological diagnosis could help prevent unnecessary endocrinological deficits. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24779.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.