ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Preoperative tumor embolization via pedicle artery sacrifice for symptomatic spinal aneurysmal bone cysts: illustrative cases.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpinal aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) are challenging to manage due to high vascularity and proximity to critical structures. Two patients with large, symptomatic thoracic ABCs are presented. OBSERVATIONS: Preoperative tumor embolization via pedicle artery sacrifice was performed prior to planned resection to reduce intraoperative blood loss and the risk of postoperative neurological deficits. Less intraoperative blood loss contributes to better surgical visualization and patient stability, thereby promoting maximal safe tumor resection with reduced neurological morbidity. Coil embolization was selected in both cases due to lower risks of nontarget embolization given local feeders to the anterior spinal artery. Provocative methohexital and lidocaine testing was performed with intraoperative monitoring to minimize risk prior to embolizing each vessel. LESSONS: The indications for preoperative embolization for spinal ABCs remain controversial. The risks associated with this embolization strategy, including those inherent to spinal angiography and embolization as well as increased costs, are potentially outweighed by the benefits of decreased intraoperative blood loss to maximize surgical safety and risks in select patients. In both cases, complete tumor resection was achieved, with the patients experiencing no adverse effects due to embolization, lower-than-expected intraoperative blood loss, and near-complete return of neurological function. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24580.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.